<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft: REJECTED!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joshkim.org/2008/02/09/microsoft-rejected/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joshkim.org/2008/02/09/microsoft-rejected/</link>
	<description>There is no end in sight.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 03:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://joshkim.org/2008/02/09/microsoft-rejected/#comment-6049</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 08:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshkim.org/2008/02/09/microsoft-rejected/#comment-6049</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;though i do agree that 31 a share is undervaluing yahoo (who was trading at 28 at the time), i do think microsoft + yahoo is a good thing - they both are massively lagging behind and would be good competition for google. this would promote pressure for new apps, better usability, and hopefully produce new functionality. from an "evil corporation" point of view, murdock+myspace is much more evil than microsoft. if i were yang, i'd be, "hey no go this time, but let's talk."&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>though i do agree that 31 a share is undervaluing yahoo (who was trading at 28 at the time), i do think microsoft + yahoo is a good thing - they both are massively lagging behind and would be good competition for google. this would promote pressure for new apps, better usability, and hopefully produce new functionality. from an &#8220;evil corporation&#8221; point of view, murdock+myspace is much more evil than microsoft. if i were yang, i&#8217;d be, &#8220;hey no go this time, but let&#8217;s talk.&#8221;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
