<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google, Wave To Firefly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joshkim.org/2009/10/07/a-firefly-moment-with-google-wave/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joshkim.org/2009/10/07/a-firefly-moment-with-google-wave/</link>
	<description>Be Awesome Instead // Essays by Josh Kim</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:16:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JSyi</title>
		<link>http://joshkim.org/2009/10/07/a-firefly-moment-with-google-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-386</link>
		<dc:creator>JSyi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshkim.org/?p=1241#comment-386</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;lost half my essay&quot; being plausible given such a large scale network with potentially enormous amounts of data. Without a dedicated &quot;source&quot; box, all you might have access to is a simple repeater stack that pops, sends, and is often unreliable?&lt;br&gt;It, I suppose, would be a question of having thin clients, which still need to connect somewhere, and how reliable and redundant that connection can be when scaled to dimensions far beyond what has been imagined, both in terms of bandwidth and range (others?).&lt;br&gt;Or some conjecture like that.. It&#039;s 5am.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;lost half my essay&#8221; being plausible given such a large scale network with potentially enormous amounts of data. Without a dedicated &#8220;source&#8221; box, all you might have access to is a simple repeater stack that pops, sends, and is often unreliable?<br />It, I suppose, would be a question of having thin clients, which still need to connect somewhere, and how reliable and redundant that connection can be when scaled to dimensions far beyond what has been imagined, both in terms of bandwidth and range (others?).<br />Or some conjecture like that.. It&#39;s 5am.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

