399,999,999.

Did You Not See This Coming?

I don’t really want to explain why (at least, not right now), but here’s how.

Go here. Then click submit after typing in your password and filling out the CAPTCHA.

Try logging in later (in 14 days) to make sure. If it asks if you want to reactivate, it didn’t take.

Via Wikihow.

Here Comes The Confirmation Email

Hi Josh,

We have received a request to permanently delete your account. Your account has been deactivated from the site and will be permanently deleted within 14 days.

If you did not request to permanently delete your account, follow this link to cancel this request:

http://www.facebook.com/account_delete.php

Thanks, The Facebook Team

Thank you. 14 days, though? This better mean you blasted through previous backups, too. (Probably not… but I guess that’s better than nothing.)

Haven’t You Done This Before?

Yes. To my memory, I’ve done it twice before. I came back the first time to see what the big deal was about the design changes, which turns out weren’t really that big of a deal. I think the second time had something to do with the username land grab, and I’ve been sitting on “joshkim” for a while.

Actually, it was the username bit that kind of made me hesitant, until I realized that I won’t actually be using that user account for anything anyway. Actually, now my /joshkim page is going nowhere. Interesting.

I’m not completely ignoring Facebook, though. It’s definitely trying something new in the world of the Semantic Web, and while I support that cause, I will not support any one single authority on this front.

It’s not like you people are going to miss me on Facebook anyway… did you even know I was friendless for a couple weeks now? :-)

Next post will be on how to reach me as I continue to simplify my life, in the real world as well as the digital one.

Let Me Try This Again, Part 3.2: Entertainment: Video Games

A Sidenote

If this post makes it up successfully, I will have made three posts in a 24 hour period. If people can define a recession as an economic downturn for two quarters, I can define the “return” to blogging as more than two posts in a 24 hour period.

Or something like that. And now for something not all too completely different.

World of Warcraft

This game has been a… “game changer” in a couple of instances in my life. It has made me a hermit, lost me the A in a very A-able engineering class, and helped me keep friendships across state lines. Needless to say, the online phenomenon that is WoW has changed my life for the better and for the worse.

I recently picked up the game a couple months back with the intention of enjoying the game’s content from 60 to 70. Which I did. A bit too much. I even started the insanity that is the 25-man raids. (I had run a 40-man before, but it was quite a while ago.)

I had quite the fun. But then at one point, it started to become work. I had to get the items. It started to become that addiction that I had once gotten rid of.

And this WoW business… it’s amazingly addictive. Take away everything… the professions, the pvp, the thinly veiled dress-up game… but keep the social always-on aspect of it, and it’ll still be extremely addictive. This is, of course, assuming you have actually passed the tipping point of knowing other people that are willing to play as much or even more than you.

[And here it comes: the obligatory reference to some web application] It’s like Facebook. But prettier. And instead of profiles or other personal information, you have… the Frozen Shadowweave Set.

And there you go. And so I quit. Maybe I’ll return with the next expansion. I don’t doubt that it is a possibility, but I hope to have something even more exciting to look forward to in the coming months.

And no, not Rock Band. Well… maybe.

Rock Band is delicious. The question is about the Wii version of this game.

Ever since I played Guitar Hero 1 on PS, I’ve loved the series. And it didn’t matter that I didn’t know the song: I liked the one-to-one mapping of notes to some strange finger combination on the fret buttons. I actually found more musicians and bands to listen to through the entire process of playing 1, 2, 80′s, and 3.

Disclaimer: The only song that I cannot beat on expert is Through the Fires and Flames. And I feel like if I really really practiced, I could. It’s just I don’t feel like dumping so much resource into it. Some people would say “lamer”, but I’m okay with myself. Maybe not.

Sidenote: Moving along, the whole point of this series is to get all this personal crap out so you guys can actually get some meaningful content. Let me continue for just a bit longer.

Fast forward to recently when the Wii version of Rock Band was announced, as well as the news about the whole gimpedness of it all. No DLC. At all. But then, a glimmer of hope was found in the form of a song pack disc, Track Pack Vol. 1.

So it seems like I’ll be buying this. Another $170 thrown towards “Entertainment”. (I’ll most likely be renting the song pack from Gamefly, though.) I better start saving now because my budget just doesn’t allow $170 for “Real-Time Interactive Music Simulation”.

What else… What other “games”

Scramble? No. I hate that game.

Other Wii games? Boom Blox will be coming very shortly. Zack & Wiki is amazing. WarioWare, as I said before, was an incredible party game.

Yeap, that pretty much sums up Video Games.

One More Thing

Right. Portal.

That was one of the most disgustingly amazing games ever. I still do not understand to this day the infatuation with the Companion Cube, but it was like eating sticks of butter. Hmm… butter…

And that ends. Video Games.

And that ends, the three part series on the three of most pertinent things of my life: Twitter, Health, and Video Games. It’s kinda sad, really, but at least I got the ball rolling.

I think now that the ball has started to roll, I need to make sure there’s enough ground for it to roll. The blog is in disrepair (category structure is screwed up, commenting is also screwy, older/newer links are not working correctly) and I intend to fix it. Maybe this week.

Closing

I like sidenotes, tangents, and disclaimers. But I’m realizing how much they break up the flow of the posts. I have to figure out how to do prettier footnotes with little superscript numbers. Bah, more work to do on the blog itself, I guess.

Let Me Try This Again, Part 1: Twitter

I believe this is the third post (that actually made online… I’m not even counting the countless edits and deletes) that is supposed to jump start the blogging machine raging within me.

Maybe if I make this post into “Part 1″ of many, I’ll be compelled to come back and explore new topics. Oh, how much I love to trick myself into doing things.

And so, after closing AIM and Twitter: Let me try this again.

“What are you doing?”

Yes. If you’ve been watching anything on this blog for the past three months, I’ve had 80… EIGHTY… daily twitter summary posts. I think around eighty days ago was when I stopped blogging frequently.

Being such a new medium (and not just to me), I feel as though what counts as “normal” is being established. Some are seeing my updates and are completely horrified. Some are somehow led to follow me and keep up insanely quick paced and lengthy conversations (Yes, I’m looking at you, Jong-Sun… if any of you are following me on Twitter, this man probably has started up Twitter wars with me too often).

Whatever the case may be, I’ve made Twitter my own. I’ve followed and have been followed, and vice versa. It’s a different beast than anything that followed before in the Interwebs.

And it’s a refreshing feeling.

What was I doing before?

I don’t remember very well when I started my Twitter account. It must have been awhile ago… but back then, I didn’t know what I was supposed to do with it.

Of course, as with all social networks, Twitter became useful with people. Earlier on, I didn’t get it. As time passed, finding interesting people to follow (@davemc500hats, @gruber, @siooma even) and even making new people sign up to Twitter has been all too eye-opening.

But first, a little bit about StatusFix.

StatusFix’s Fix Found in Twitterific/TwitterSync

My desire with the side project of StatusFix was simple: It was what I needed. I wanted a way to track my past “away”/status messages, as well as an interface to see what other people’s were.

Even since I used the “away” message box as a secondary channel for communication, I wanted a way to have a historical backlog of it; I wanted to be able to search it (due to my insanely geeky nature of trying to have a new “away” message up every time I was “away”); I wanted it to be publicly available outside of AIM (linkable).

SIDENOTE: Why do I keep using passive? Crap.

I keep putting away in quotation marks because the “away” message is a perfect example of how people took a feature and made it their own. A vast majority of the people to this day aren’t actually away when their “away” message is up. More or less, it has become their status message: the song their listening to, the thing that they’re reading, the affect of the current weather to his or her mood. Soon, the networks realized this (MSN, I believe, was the first to implement this) and made it possible to still be online, but have a status message as well.

Due to Twitter’s extremely open API architecture (including their Jabber push mechanism), as long as they keep being stable, Twitter could be the back bone of such a system.

And so, I decided to use this backbone. Many Twitter clients (I especially prefer Twitterific) give me the ability to tie my status message with Twitter and AIM. Also, by using TwitterSync, I’m able to sync my status with Facebook.

AIM, Facebook, Twitter. One “return” to rule them all. (I really tried to using the word “return” with the Return of the King, but I stopped caring.)

The Existing Problems

As I said before, stability is a problem with Twitter. Hopefully, that’ll be dealt with soon enough, regardless if they go with some other language/framework.

Also, since this system is dependent on so many different pieces, it’s much more likely to fail than, say, having an actual fully fledged app to handle all statuses.

This also means that people are getting the same content three times. If a friend of mine is also on AIM, Facebook, and Twitter, they’ll see the same update in three different streams.

But then again, maybe these problems will be fixed by StatusFix, or some other solution. FriendFeed? Maybe.

More likely, I’m making a big deal out of nothing. My needs tend to be quite specific at times.

WEEE!!!

Which reminds me, the next post will do something with the Wii. And Rock Band. Or something.

Or I’ll work on the actual blog itself.

Quick Twitter Review and Other Ponderings

Twitter Logo

I’m beginning to like Twitter more and more. The only thing that’s stopping me from using it as much as possible is: the lack of pertinent users. I’m not talking about the awesome developers/leaders of their field people that I “follow”, but people that I actually know in, you know, real life. Outside of my nerdier friends, I don’t know of anyone that use Twitter. Yet.

But this situation is making me think about social networks in general: each network seems to create a culture of its own. This is not a new view on social networks, but it’s interesting I’m seeing it now with Twitter.

Facebook with their college crowd, Myspace with their musician/high school crowd, and now Twitter with their tech crowd.

Of course, this doesn’t mean that these social networks won’t grow into other groups of users. It’s just that certain networks tend towards a faster and wider adoption with the general population than others. And Twitter, at face value, just doesn’t seem to be a service that can grow very quickly.

I would never use the texting feature (thanks to the iPhone, I don’t have to), but I feel like this feature will help Twitter gain a wider appeal with the slightly more techie crowd.

I do like the 140 character limit, and not because it has to do with the limitations of the texting protocol, but because it puts some creative limits on what I am able to “tweet”. Also, the inability to edit an existing post makes you double check yourself before tweeting.

You know, I never thought about it, but there’s probably an iTunes to Twitter Applescript. The Twitter API is so freeing. But also… this can lead to information overload.

So much power. So much responsibility.

And that ends my rambling on Twitter.

Is This Thing On?

Twitter needs to start being more stable, or I’m going to start throwing chairs.

This afternoon, Facebook was a little spotty too.

And EDGE was down for my iPhone today.

MY WORLD IS CRASHING! AHH!

Well, at least, I’m not in the middle east. Not because of the warfare (well, that’s beside the point), but because of the Internet outage over there.

The Moment I've Been Waiting For: Facebook Financial Numbers

Seriously, I still don’t understand how this guy is the CEO of this company. Really. Have you seen the 60 minutes segment on this guy? His looks, his personality, his style… all doesn’t fit into the CEO idea in my head. But anyway, he ended up dropping some numbers today.

Recap of Facebook Financial Info

Facebook’s Revenue: $150m

Facebook’s Projected Revenue: $300 to $350m

Facebook’s Projected Expenditures: $200m

Facebook’s EBITDA: $50m

All together this means: $150m negative projected for this year.

Of course, this doesn’t count the $300m in investments from Microsoft, so they’ll still be in business… but I sure hope they figure out how to make the money soon, and in a way that doesn’t piss off the users.

Source: Chatty Zuckerberg Tells All About Facebook Finances

Sidenote: MySpace

MySpace’s revenue (ending June 2007): $550m

MySpace’s profit (ending June 2007): $10m

Source: (MySpace revenue to top $800 million in fiscal 2008)

MySpace’s Projected Revenue (at Oct 2007):$800m

Source: (Murdoch Cuts MySpace 2008 Estimates)

User “Counts”

Regardless of how much I hate MySpace, people use it. People click on the advertisements, and so MySpace keeps making money.

The point here is that it’s good to be #1. MySpace has more than 110m monthly active users (Social Network Stats:Facebook, MySpace, Reunion), while facebook has 68m monthly active users (The shy Mark Zuckerberg, founder of Facebook).

If all these numbers are right, then Facebook has some serious catching up to do. Here’s my fuzzy math on revenue per user:

Revenue / Monthly Active Users of MySpace = 550/110 = 5

Revenue / Monthly Active Users of Facebook = 150/68 ~= 2.2

Does this mean a Facebook times 2 equals a MySpace in revenue?

My Takeaway/Realization From All This Math

If you’re making a free “social network”, and your single monetization strategy is advertising, you better hope you’re #1. Or freaking close to it.

Facebook Interface Update: Doesn't look good…

At first, I thought my browser wasn’t fully rendering the page.

Then I realized… wow, they’re not kidding. This is an update.

Things are broken all over the place, especially the external Facebook applications.

Looks like they’re fixing things live… what’s the deal, Facebook… you’re dropping the ball.

EDIT: Looks like I should have taken a screenshot when I had the chance. Darn.

Your data. YOUR.

In light of some of the more recent things that have been happening…

I really have to get a couple things off my chest. Also, it’s kinda funny how all this flurry of activity is happening as I’m trying to do more research in this area of web applications.

HanMeta is embarking on creating a service that might ease or further instigate the situation. More on that later.

User data should be the user’s.

It is my firm belief that people should own their own “stuff”; physical stuff as well as digital data. Sounds pretty trivial, but in terms of data, this isn’t happening. Silos are building up, where information is just begging to be freed.

Some services are offering APIs to facilitate this, but the larger players (both Facebook, AIM, and Google, as well as others) aren’t playing ball with the standards bodies. They’re moving towards it, but we’re only getting a subset of the data.

Now, am I advocating all-out accessible stores of data? I think I might be. I don’t want to get inundated with comments in the future when this isn’t the case… But I feel as though this makes the most sense to me as I sit in this chair today.

I feel like in the future, all people will have access to all their data at all times. Be it through some kind of external device like a PDA (or some kind of breakthrough Internet device… coughiPhonecough) or some kind of internal device like an embedded chip, we will constantly be connected to the Internet. It would send data like where you were standing or what your friend’s dinner plans looked like.

That is the future I want. It would be a privacy nightmare if incorrectly implemented, but this future is likely. Heck, it’s already here: It’s just not used by the majority of the population just yet.

Internet is distribution. Just like how the rest of the Internet would run just fine without Google (although, it’d be a little messy getting around) and its servers, there are standards in place for how routers should be passing packets around from senders to receivers.

The point that I’m trying to make is that there should be a place for a person to have their data “in the Clouds”, but there should be an ability to take that data elsewhere. Like taking your money from a bank and moving it to a cooler bank 2.0.

Did I just freaking type “bank 2.0″? [svn co hari-kiri]

Services having user data is a privilege, not a right.

Services should be providing the people with information that can be based on that data. Services should NOT bully people into using a crappier service just because the data is stored there.

Now I’m not saying the services should never retain the data. However, I feel as though the ability to take your data out of any service is very important.

For example, let’s say there was a site that tracked all the movies I’ve seen. If this information was open (APML, it looks like) I would be able to add to this data from movie rentals at Blockbuster, match it up with IMDB, and have it available on my Flixster Facebook Application.

The long stretch: RIAA and Facebook

Competitive advantage by locking out users to use your service… This is just like the MPAA/RIAA/Every OTHER Freaking Middleman Media Company wanting control of people’s “stuff”.

I feel like in this digital age, all of this is retarded. All this effort will be made pointless due to the fact that your users, your customers, want to do so much more with their stuff. They want to do mashups with their music and anime shows, have their favorite song playing on their profile (with no legal constraint), be branded by their favorite computer company…

I should be able to export all the email I have from Gmail and take it to another service if I wanted to. But I have no reason to, because Gmail is far better than anything I’ve used previously, and I don’t have any glaring issues with it to look for an alternative. This is where services will win: Make it awesome.

What happened with Scoble and Facebook

Scoble was trying to import names, birthdays, and email addresses of his friends on Facebook to Plaxo by using their optical character recognition technology. Which got his account temporarily disabled, and he got it back soon after agreeing not to run the script again.

My two cents: this is pretty borderline stuff. Scraping pages have always had a stigma because it’s a not-so-normal way of getting to the data. I had no problems scraping course data from the University of Illinois course page (of course, later I found out that there was an XML version of it… that’s besides the point) because there was no way of getting to it other than by scraping. But here, this was flagrantly against the Terms of Service.

Services like FriendCSV abides by the ToS by getting only the data that is accessible by the API provided by Facebook. But what Plaxo did was gutsy: they attempted to break open the Facebook silo.

Is this legal? Well, it did go against Facebook’s ToS and therefore I’m more willing to side with Facebook. But should that last question even be valid, meaning shouldn’t this data already belong in the hands of users to being with? I don’t know. It’s hazy.

Facebook owns the mapping of people to people. There is no doubt in my mind that Facebook has got people together into a huge social… dang it… “graph” (sigh). That is amazing. It’s what they’ll do with this data that’s going to be even more amazing.

So… HanMeta?

The project at HanMeta is trying to merge the silos just a little bit. Initially, we’ve decided to take a bite out of statues. To capture birthdays, names of family members, number of McRibs eaten this past McRib season (4, by the way), maybe even email addresses for the networks that gives us that data… that’ll all come later.

But after all is said and done, our data will be portable. I don’t intend on holding back the Internet any more. I would like to create a network using as many open standards as possible (dataportability.org).

It’s just the question of when this will happen. Most of our resources at this early stage will be used up on actually getting this information and ensuring privacy limits are set correctly.

I’m feeling a bit like Skullbocks…

If you get that reference, I should give you a cookie.

Are we building a Synapse? Uh oh… heh.

Facebook Updates, Again…

The ‘Friends’ pages got a lovely update. Everything is so much more AJAXy… delicious.

Now you can make a “List” for your friends, so you can keep groups of people handy for sending out spam… er… invitations.

Just recently they got of “is” in the status messages.

Good to see finally that they’re adding features that users have been wanting for quite a while… maybe Facebook is trying to make up for the Beacon fiasco.

EDIT: Friend removal has become much easier with the little “x” in the Friends page. Interesting.